How I’m building evidence-led SA capability.
I’m developing into Solution Architecture because it aligns with what I’ve already been doing informally for years: taking messy cross-functional problems and turning them into clear systems, trade-offs, and delivery paths that hold up under scrutiny.
My engineering leadership background gives me strength in delivery, governance, and operating in constrained environments. I’m building SA depth through hands-on demonstrators and structured learning - and I’m documenting it all so the evidence is visible.
I’m building four case studies as progressive architecture demonstrators, each chosen to develop specific SA muscles (identity, cost control, data, operations, scalability):
TacSA (Technical Analytics for Complex System Architectures) is my main SA demonstrator: a tactical simulation and analytics concept designed to explore cloud-native architecture, cost control, security boundaries, and scalable workloads.
This website is also a system I designed and built as a controlled publishing workflow: gated admin access, environment separation (dev/prod), and approval-based deployment via pull requests. The goal was to build a real platform with constraints - and use it as evidence of practical architecture thinking.
I also build smaller tools that reinforce guardrails and reliability - for example a lightweight VS Code extension (“tacsa-branch-sentinel”) that reduces the risk of working on the wrong Git branch via status-bar tinting and workspace-aware handling.
Next: Case Studies (the evidence), or Working Style (how I operate day-to-day).